ABSTRACT
Background: To direct limited specialized palliative care resources to patients in greatest need, we developed STEP (Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care). STEP entails symptom screening (ESAS-r) at each oncology clinic visit and triggered alerts (for moderate-high physical and psychological symptoms) to a nurse who calls the patient to offer a palliative care clinic (PCC) visit. We conducted a phase III RCT to assess the impact of STEP versus usual care on quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: Adults with advanced cancer were recruited from medical oncology clinics at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. Consenting patients with oncologist-assessed ECOG 0-2 and estimated survival of 6-36 months were enrolled and block randomized (stratified by tumour site and symptom severity) to STEP or usual care. Participants completed measures of quality of life (FACT-G7), depression (PHQ-9), symptom control (ESASr-CS), and satisfaction with care (FAMCARE-P16) at baseline, 2, 4 and 6 months. The primary outcome was FACT-G7 at 6 months, with a planned sample size of 261/arm. Results: From 8/2019 to 3/2020, 69 patients were enrolled: 33 randomized to STEP and 36 to usual care. The trial was then halted permanently due to the COVID-19 pandemic, owing to substantial changes to elements of STEP (shift to virtual symptom screening and palliative care) and usual care (shift to virtual oncology care). Median age was 64 years (range 25-87) and 62% (43/69) were women;study arms were balanced at baseline except gender, with more women randomized to STEP. Within the STEP arm, 20 (61%) participants triggered a nurse's call to offer a PCC visit, of whom 13 attended the clinic at least once. All outcomes tended to be better in the STEP arm compared to usual care, particularly depression and satisfaction with care at 6 months;however, results were not statistically significant (Table). Conclusions: STEP holds promise for improving quality of life and other PROs in patients with advanced cancer and effectively directing early palliative care towards those who need it most. In response to the pandemic, an online version of STEP has been developed and a further trial is in progress.
ABSTRACT
Introduction To direct scant specialized palliative care (PC) resources to patients in greatest need, we developed the STEP intervention (Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care). STEP entails symptom screening with ESAS-r at each oncology visit and triggered alerts (for moderatehigh symptoms) to a nurse who calls the patient to offer a PC clinic visit. Methods Consenting adults with advanced cancer, ECOG 0-2, attending medical oncology clinics at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, were randomized to STEP or usual care. Participants completed quality of life (FACTG7), depression (PHQ-9), symptom control (ESASr-CS), and satisfaction with care (FAMCARE-P16) measures at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary outcome was FACT-G7 at 6 months. Results From August 2019 to March 2020, 33 patients were randomized to STEP and 36 to usual care. The trial was subsequently permanently halted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Groups were balanced at baseline except gender, with more females in the STEP arm (Table 1). In the STEP arm, 20 participants triggered a nurse 's call, of whom 13 had ≥1 PC clinic visit. At 6 months, all outcomes tended to be better in the STEP arm compared to usual care, particularly depression and satisfaction with care;however, results were not statistically significant (Table 2, Figure 1). Conclusions STEP holds promise for improving outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. An online version (eSTEP) is being developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Background: The two FDA approved mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccines have shown >90% efficacy at preventing COVID and eliciting protective immunity in nearly all healthy individuals. However, the extent of vaccine induced antibody and T cell immunity in immunocompromised patients is not well known. Our study objective is to determine if patients with hematologic malignancies treated with B-cell targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies can mount antibody and T cell immune responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccines. A prospective single-center study to evaluate the SARS-CoV2 immune responses in immunocompromised individuals (COVAX Study) was initiated at University of Pennsylvania following the IRB guidelines. The study enrolled 8 healthy adults,12 patients are in remission after treatment (average of 40.6 months) with CART cells targeting either CD19 or CD19+CD22 and received both doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Methods and Results: Serology to SARS-CoV2 spike-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, RBD-IgA, RBD-IgM and spike-specific T cell responses were measured prior to vaccination and serially up to 28 days after booster vaccination. RBD-IgG and RBD-IgA were detected in 8/8 and 7/8 healthy subjects compared to 5/12 and 2/12 CART patients, respectively (Figure A). In the CART cohort, several patients who demonstrated an induction of RBD-IgG (57.2/uL +/- 20.2) compared to those who were RBD-IgG-negative (9/uL +/- 10.1, ANOVA with multiple comparisons test p=0.017) have higher level of circulating B cells. No association was found with time since CART infusion, age, disease type, or vaccine manufacturer. All 8 healthy subjects demonstrated induction of SARS-Cov2 spike-specific CD4 + T cell immunity compared to 7 out of 11 CART patients (Figure B). RBD-IgG responses were not correlated with CD4 + T cell activation (Pearson correlation, R=0.21, p=0.53). Indeed, 3 CART patients demonstrated robust CD4 + T cell activation despite absence of antibody induction. Overall, 8/12 CART patients demonstrated induction of either or both humoral and T cell immune responses. Conclusions: We show that immune responses to SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccines are induced in majority of patients who have been treated with CART therapies targeting B-cell lineage antigens. Induction of vaccine-specific antibody was strongly associated with the level of circulating B cells. However, in CART cohort patients despite severe humoral immune deficiency, strong CD4 + T cell responses were observed suggestive of a sufficient protective immunity. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Frey: Novartis: Research Funding;Sana Biotechnology: Consultancy;Kite Pharma: Consultancy;Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Garfall: Amgen: Honoraria;CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Tmunity: Research Funding. Porter: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: Honoraria;Genentech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months;ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;DeCart: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding;Tmunity: Patents & Royalties;Wiley and Sons Publishing: Honoraria. June: AC Immune, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Consultancy;Tmunity, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Novartis: Patents & Royalties.
ABSTRACT
Background: This project is the second phase of a clinical quality improvement (QI) project, which aims to develop a pilot program to provide transitional services to persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Transitional services refer to those provided during the acute period post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, as persons with SCI reintegrate to community living. The first phase of the QI project is documented elsewhere. Objectives: To contribute to the holistic understanding of the barriers and facilitators that influence the transition process, and ways of supporting persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) through the transition. Methods: This project includes analysis of surveys that were distributed under the previous phase of the QI project as well as development, administration, and analysis of second round surveys. This project also includes an environmental scan and researching evaluation methods for similar projects in the published literature. Provision of services during the COVID-19 pandemic was researched. Results: There are a variety of transitional models of care from outpatient clinics to in-home and communitybased services. Survey respondents described challenges during their transition experience with emergent challenges noted by those who discharged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Community services in Calgary were described to identify gaps in support for persons with SCI during the transition. Conclusions: The transition from hospital to home must be bolstered, and context-relevant rehabilitation is needed. Future programs must be developed to weather uncertain circumstances, such as a global pandemic or inclement weather, to ensure continuous support for persons with SCI.